HomeLibraryServicesCase studiesBlogAbout
consultance.ai
Book a discovery call →

Services

  • AI consulting
  • AI implementation
  • AI agents
  • Workflow automation
  • RAG systems
  • Voice AI
  • Custom AI development
  • All services

Library

  • AI build library
  • Finance AI automation
  • AiToEarn content agent
  • Fincept Terminal
  • ERPNext
  • SEO + GEO Claude skill
  • Claude for Legal
  • Free Claude Code proxy

Resources

  • Case studies
  • Blog
  • Industries
  • Locations
  • Guide: AI for property management
  • Guide: AI for marketing agencies
  • Guide: AI agents vs Zapier
  • AI glossary
  • vs traditional consulting

Company

  • About
  • Book a call
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2026 consultance.ai · AI, implemented.

audit → build → deploy

← Libraryconsultance.ai
Book a build call
Finance and data

Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts

10 Claude prompts that run a CPA-grade month-end close and multi-entity consolidation on your own books, the technical accounting judgment a controller or Big 4 reviewer gets paid for.

Free — runs in your own ClaudeMedium setup · 4 steps10 ready-to-run prompts
Set it up free — takes 3 minutes ↓Or have us wire it in →
Step 1 · setup
Three minutes, four steps, nothing to install by hand

Claude sets it up for you. You just paste.

Never used Claude? It is free and takes 30 seconds to open. Copy the instruction below, paste it into Claude, and it reads this page and walks you through everything, one question at a time.

  1. 1

    Tell Claude how to talk to you

    One tap. It changes how much Claude explains, and how slowly it goes. You can change it any time.

  2. 2

    Copy your setup instruction

    A short instruction plus a link to this page lands on your clipboard. First copy asks for your email once. That unlocks every button across the whole library.

  3. 3

    Open Claude in a new tab

    Free account, no card, 30 seconds. This tab stays open so you can come back.

    Open claude.ai ↗
  4. 4

    Paste, send, and answer one question

    Claude reads this page, asks one question about your work, then guides you step by step until your first output is right. If anything looks wrong, tell Claude what you see, and it fixes it with you.

▸Prefer the full prompt instead of the link? (optional)
Click to copy
Set me up with Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts in my own Claude. There is nothing to install and nothing to download: this is a prompt pack I run inside Claude on my own data.

Guide: https://consultance.ai/library/cpa-far-bookkeeper-test
What it does: 10 Claude prompts that run a CPA-grade month-end close and multi-entity consolidation on your own books, the technical accounting judgment a controller or Big 4 reviewer gets paid for.

I am comfortable copy-pasting and following instructions, but I am not a developer.

Rules:
- Plain English. Define jargon the first time it appears (repo, env var, port, dependency).
- One step at a time. Exact command in a code block. Tell me which app to paste it into (Terminal on Mac, PowerShell on Windows).
- One sentence per command explaining what it does and what success looks like.
- After each command, wait. I will tell you the output before you move on.
- If a tool is missing (git, node, docker, python), give me the one-line install for my OS first.
- If something errors, diagnose before the next step. Do not skip.

First message: ask only "What is your operating system, macOS, Windows, or Linux?" Then start step 1.

Setup steps from the public guide (adapt them to me, do not just paste them at me):
1. Open Claude, pin Opus 5 for the judgment prompts (revenue, lease, consolidation, FX, the close memo), create a private Project named for the period. Team or Enterprise keeps the books in your tenant.
2. Run prompt 01, the onboarding router. Pick the close type (single-entity, multi-entity consolidation, quarter-end with judgment, year-end) and choose where your books live: upload trial balance and sub-ledger exports, paste raw figures, use the Claude Excel add-in, or pull from a governed connector (NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, Odoo).
3. Load your data the way you chose, then run prompts 02 to 10 in order: reconciliation do-not-plug gate, accruals and cutoff, fixed assets and cap-policy test, ASC 606 revenue, ASC 842 leases, consolidation and intercompany elimination, ASC 830 FX translation, source-tie self-check, controller review memo and board package.
4. Prompt 09 blocks any untied number; prompt 10 is the controller's signature, not the model's. A named licensed CPA signs before anything reaches the board.

Stop when I have run the first prompt on my own data and confirmed the output looks right.
Step 2 · run it on your data

Step 1 set it up. These 10 prompts do the work.

the vault

The 10 prompts

Grab the whole pack as one file, or tap any prompt below to copy it on its own. Placeholders that look like {{THIS}} get swapped for your own numbers — and if you ran Step 1, Claude fills them in for you.

One .md file · all 10 prompts, numbered, in order · nothing left out.
Click to copy
<role>You are a controller's office in one: a CPA controller who has signed 200+ closes, a Big 4 technical accounting partner fluent in the FASB Codification, a consolidations manager, and a revenue and lease specialist. You run the close with the rigor a CPA FAR examiner expects and the skepticism of an audit senior.</role>

<onboarding>
Before any accounting, set up the engagement. Ask me to confirm each block. Offer the options. Do not assume.

1. CLOSE TYPE — which is this?
   (A) Single-entity month-end close
   (B) Multi-entity consolidation (parent + subs)
   (C) Quarter-end with revenue, lease, and FX judgment
   (D) Year-end / audit-prep close
   (E) Diagnostic only — review a close someone else did

2. WHERE DO YOUR BOOKS LIVE? Pick all that apply. This decides how the next prompts run.
   (A) I will upload exports (trial balance, sub-ledger detail, bank statements, prior close) into this Claude project's knowledge.
   (B) I will paste raw figures (TB, GL detail, statements) into the prompt.
   (C) I have the Claude add-in for Microsoft Excel — work directly in my workbook.
   (D) I have a governed connector to my accounting system (NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, Odoo) — pull under governed access.
   (E) A mix of the above.

3. CLOSE CONTEXT — fill what you have:
   Entity / group: {{ENTITY_NAME}}
   Period end: {{PERIOD_END}}
   GAAP framework: {{FRAMEWORK}} (US GAAP / IFRS)
   Functional + reporting currency: {{CURRENCY}}
   Entities in scope + ownership %: {{ENTITIES_AND_OWNERSHIP}}
   Materiality threshold: {{MATERIALITY}}

4. OUTPUT BAR — confirm: every adjusting entry is account Dr/Cr + amount + rationale; every figure ties to a source or my input; every estimate is labeled ASSUMPTION; every cited standard names the ASC section.
</onboarding>

<rules>
- Never force a number to balance. If something does not tie, escalate it as an open item, never plug it.
- Never fabricate a figure. If it is not in my data or my input, ask or label ASSUMPTION.
- Match every later prompt to the data source I chose in step 2.
- Cite the ASC section for every judgment call.
- Flag your single most aggressive position for human sign-off.
- Always end with "Next step:" and the next prompt to run.
</rules>

Confirm my four blocks back to me, then wait for prompt 02.
Click to copy
<role>Audit senior running first-pass reconciliations with professional skepticism.</role>

<task>
Using the data source I chose in prompt 01, reconcile cash and every material balance-sheet account for {{PERIOD_END}}.
1. Build the bank reconciliation: bank balance, deposits in transit, outstanding checks, bank-only items (fees, NSF, interest), and book-side corrections.
2. Reconcile each material account (AR, AP, prepaids, accruals, fixed assets, debt) to its sub-ledger or supporting schedule.
3. List every reconciling item as a proposed adjusting entry (account Dr/Cr + amount + rationale).
4. If any account does NOT tie after known items, report the exact unreconciled difference and an investigation plan. Do not plug it. Do not force it.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. Every reconciling item cites its source. An unreconciled difference above {{MATERIALITY}} is escalated, never balanced by a forced entry.</constraints>

<review_gate>I review the proposed entries and personally clear or investigate every unreconciled difference before it posts.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Controller enforcing accrual GAAP and period cutoff.</role>

<task>
Work the matching principle for {{PERIOD_END}} from my data source.
1. Identify expenses incurred but not booked (payroll earned not paid + employer taxes, vendor invoices arriving after cutoff, utilities/usage). Propose the accrual entries.
2. Identify prepaids expensed in full that should be amortized over their term. Propose the reclass + the monthly amortization schedule.
3. Identify revenue or cash receipts that need deferral (see prompt 05 for the full ASC 606 pass) and flag them.
4. Test cutoff: list anything booked in the wrong period.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. Each entry is Dr/Cr + amount + rationale. Show the math for every accrual (rate, base, period fraction).</constraints>

<review_gate>I confirm each accrual's basis and approve the amortization schedules.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Fixed-asset specialist applying the capitalization policy literally.</role>

<task>
Review fixed assets and depreciation for {{PERIOD_END}}.
1. Test every capital-vs-expense call against my written cap policy. Apply the threshold PER INDIVIDUAL ASSET unless the policy says otherwise. Flag items expensed that should be capitalized AND items capitalized that should have been expensed.
2. Recompute depreciation for the period and YTD on every asset (method, life, salvage, in-service date). Catch any missed monthly entry.
3. Reconcile the fixed-asset subledger to the GL; report accumulated depreciation by asset.
4. Propose the catch-up entries.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. The cap policy threshold is tested per unit, not on an aggregate purchase, unless my policy explicitly aggregates. Show the depreciation math per asset.</constraints>

<review_gate>I approve every reclassification and depreciation catch-up before posting.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Revenue recognition specialist running the ASC 606 five-step model.</role>

<task>
For each contract I provide, run ASC 606 end to end.
1. Identify the contract and the distinct performance obligations (ASC 606-10-25-14).
2. Determine the transaction price, INCLUDING variable consideration. State the estimation method (expected value vs most-likely-amount, ASC 606-10-32-8) and apply the constraint (606-10-32-11) where reversal is probable.
3. Allocate the transaction price across obligations on relative standalone selling price (606-10-32-31). If a variable amount relates specifically to one obligation and meets both criteria of 606-10-32-39/40, allocate it entirely to that obligation rather than pro rata. State which treatment you used and why.
4. Recognize revenue per obligation: point in time (606-10-25-30) vs over time (606-10-25-27). Show what is earned this period vs deferred.
5. Propose the entries: revenue, deferred revenue, contract asset/liability.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. Cash collected is not revenue. Cite the ASC section for every judgment. Flag the most aggressive position (typically an unconstrained variable amount) for sign-off.</constraints>

<review_gate>I review every recognition judgment and confirm acceptance evidence before unconstrained variable consideration is recognized.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Technical accountant applying ASC 842 to each lease.</role>

<task>
For each lease I provide, do the full ASC 842 work.
1. Classify: run all five finance-lease criteria (ASC 842-10-25-2/25-3) — transfer, purchase option, term vs economic life, PV vs fair value, specialized asset. State each result. Conclude finance vs operating.
2. Measure: compute the lease liability as the PV of payments at the borrowing rate; set the ROU asset. State the discount rate and annuity factor used.
3. Period entries: commencement entry, then the period expense. For operating leases, show the single straight-line lease cost split into interest accretion and ROU amortization. Note whether payments in arrears cause the liability to rise before the first payment.
4. Roll forward liability and ROU balances to period end.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. Show the PV math and the annuity factor. Cite ASC 842 sections for classification and measurement.</constraints>

<review_gate>I confirm the discount rate, classification, and the roll-forward before posting.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Consolidations manager rolling up the group under ASC 810.</role>

<task>
Consolidate the entities in scope for {{PERIOD_END}} from my data source.
1. Eliminate the parent's equity-method pickup so consolidated lines are not double-counted; eliminate the investment against subsidiary equity and establish noncontrolling interest (ASC 810-10-45-15 to -21).
2. Eliminate ALL intercompany transactions in full regardless of ownership: intercompany sales/COGS, the loan principal, the intercompany interest income/expense, and the intercompany AR/AP.
3. Eliminate unrealized profit in ending intercompany inventory. State whether the sale is DOWNSTREAM (parent to sub: 100% of the unrealized profit hits the controlling interest, none to NCI) or UPSTREAM (sub to parent: split the elimination by ownership and reduce NCI's share). This direction call is the trap; get it right.
4. Allocate subsidiary net income (and OCI) to NCI by ownership %.
5. Produce the consolidated trial balance and the elimination entries.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. Intercompany must eliminate to zero. State downstream vs upstream explicitly and show the NCI math. Cite ASC 810 sections.</constraints>

<review_gate>I confirm the elimination entries and the NCI attribution before the consolidated TB is used.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Technical accountant applying ASC 830 to foreign operations.</role>

<task>
For each foreign entity I provide, do the FX work.
1. Determine the functional currency and conclude whether to TRANSLATE (current-rate method, ASC 830-30) or REMEASURE (temporal method, ASC 830-10-45-17). State why.
2. If translating: assets and liabilities at the closing rate, income statement at the average rate, equity at historical. Route the resulting translation difference to the cumulative translation adjustment in OCI (ASC 830-30-45-12), never to the P&L.
3. If remeasuring: nonmonetary items at historical rate, monetary at closing, with the remeasurement gain/loss to earnings.
4. Show the building/nonmonetary trap explicitly: under the current-rate method, nonmonetary assets translate at the CLOSING rate, not frozen at historical. Allocate the period CTA share to NCI for partially owned foreign subs.
</task>

<constraints>Use the data source from prompt 01. State the method and the rate used for each line. CTA goes to OCI under translation; gains/losses go to earnings only under remeasurement. Cite ASC 830 sections.</constraints>

<review_gate>I confirm the functional-currency conclusion and the method before the CTA posts.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Reviewing controller running a final tie-out before the close is used.</role>

<task>
Audit your own work from prompts 02 through 08.
1. List every figure that flows to the financial statements and tie each to its source (a document, my input, or a labeled assumption).
2. Flag any number that is not tied to a source. Flag any entry that does not have a clear Dr/Cr + amount + rationale.
3. Re-list every open item and every unreconciled difference that is still outstanding.
4. State the single most aggressive judgment in the whole close and why it could be challenged.
5. Output a red / amber / green readiness call for the period.
</task>

<constraints>Do not assert the close is clean if any figure is untied or any reconciling difference is open. An untied number blocks a green call.</constraints>

<review_gate>I read this self-check before anything reaches the board package. Any red item stays open until I clear it.</review_gate>

Then "Next step:".
Click to copy
<role>Controller writing the review memo and the close package for the CFO and board.</role>

<task>
Produce the close package for {{PERIOD_END}}.
1. A controller's review memo: every judgment made, the standard cited, the open items, and the single most aggressive position flagged for sign-off.
2. The adjusted financial statements (income statement, balance sheet, and a flux/variance commentary vs prior period and budget, with explanations for material swings).
3. The list of entries posted this period and the entries still pending approval.
4. A "do not distribute until resolved" header listing any open item from prompt 09.
</task>

<constraints>Use the adjusted figures from the prior prompts. The flux commentary explains material variances against {{MATERIALITY}}. The memo is honest about what is unresolved.</constraints>

<review_gate>I, the named controller, sign this package. The model drafts it; my signature, not the model's, releases it to the board.</review_gate>

This is the end of the run. Re-run prompt 09 after I clear any open item.

Got the prompts. Want them wired into your actual stack? We map that on a free AI audit.

Book the free audit

Rent it forever, or own it once.

10 Claude prompts that run a CPA-grade month-end close and multi-entity consolidation on your own books, the technical accounting judgment a controller or Big 4 reviewer gets paid for.

Path A · free

You just did it

The setup rail and every prompt above are free and stay free. The cost is your time, and the risk of wiring it wrong on live data.

Back to the prompts ↑
Path B · done with you

We wire it into your business

We would deliver a private controller's desk: the 14 prompts loaded into your Claude tenant, your chart of accounts and entity hierarchy built in, the ERP export or connector wired, your materiality and GAAP framework set, and a source-tie gate so no untied figure reaches the board. Done with you, then handed over so you own it.

Book a build call →
data safety

Before you use live numbers

  • • Run last quarter's numbers first. Live data is not a test bed.
  • • Nothing here uploads to us. It runs in your own Claude account, on your own machine.
  • • A named human reviews and signs every output before it reaches a board, lender, or client.
  • • Mask account numbers and names to the minimum the task needs.
the fine print

Straight answers on ownership

Prompt set authored by consultance.ai. This is decision support, not accounting or audit advice, and does not replace a licensed CPA's professional judgment or the external audit; a named controller signs every output. Your financial data stays in your own Claude tenant; we never see it. The CPA FAR exam and Big 4 firms are referenced as the benchmark and the workflow being replaced, no affiliation implied.

Want this running in your business, not just your laptop? We build it and hand you the keys.

Book a build callBack to the library

Want this wired into your stack instead of running it yourself? That is our AI deal desk and finance automation service.

the newsletter

AI news worth opening.

The AI tools, launches, and shifts that actually matter, in plain English. New library drops the moment they land.

100% freeNo paywall, everUnsubscribe anytime

More like this

Other builds worth a weekend

All repos →
Finance and data

Free Portfolio Quant Research Desk

For family offices and serious individual investors: run a portfolio backtest, tax loss harvesting, and model risk checks on your own holdings, locally, in your own Claude. Replaces the $250k quant seat you would otherwise hire.

Setup guide →
Finance and data

Private Equity Deal Sourcing Playbook

For lower and mid market private equity origination teams: turn one mandate into a ranked, owner verified proprietary deal flow pipeline. Six Claude agents with Exa and Scrapling replace a rented deal sourcing subscription.

Setup guide →
Finance and data

Free Jira Alternative for Deal Teams

For PE deal teams and IC members still tracking a live process on a sprint board: a self hosted deal tracker your Claude can write to, plus 10 prompts that move a workstream only when the document actually lands.

Setup guide →
Get the free kitBook a call

Forward this to whoever owns the workflow.

The person drowning in this every week is the one who'll actually want it.

Forward by email
in one line

What is Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts?

Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts is a finance and data build in the consultance.ai AI Build Library. 10 Claude prompts that run a CPA-grade month-end close and multi-entity consolidation on your own books, the technical accounting judgment a controller or Big 4 reviewer gets paid for. It fits Controllers, CFOs, VP Finance, accounting firm owners, and senior bookkeepers who want CPA-grade close and consolidation judgment without the all-nighter or the five-figure technical-accounting engagement. Setup difficulty is Medium, with 4 plain-English steps.

What does Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts do?

10 Claude prompts that run a CPA-grade month-end close and multi-entity consolidation on your own books, the technical accounting judgment a controller or Big 4 reviewer gets paid for.

Who is Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts for?

It fits Controllers, CFOs, VP Finance, accounting firm owners, and senior bookkeepers who want CPA-grade close and consolidation judgment without the all-nighter or the five-figure technical-accounting engagement.

How hard is Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts to set up?

Medium to set up — one guided setup instruction covering 4 plain-English steps, plus 10 ready-to-run prompts on the resource page.

How would consultance.ai build this out?

We would deliver a private controller's desk: the 14 prompts loaded into your Claude tenant, your chart of accounts and entity hierarchy built in, the ERP export or connector wired, your materiality and GAAP framework set, and a source-tie gate so no untied figure reaches the board. Done with you, then handed over so you own it.

What are the licensing terms?

Prompt set authored by consultance.ai. This is decision support, not accounting or audit advice, and does not replace a licensed CPA's professional judgment or the external audit; a named controller signs every output. Your financial data stays in your own Claude tenant; we never see it. The CPA FAR exam and Big 4 firms are referenced as the benchmark and the workflow being replaced, no affiliation implied.

Want this built into your workflow?

Month-End Close and Consolidation Prompts is the starting point. On a free AI audit we map where it fits your stack and what consultance.ai would build around it.

This build comes from our AI consulting and AI implementation practice — see the full AI in finance guide and how we work with CFO teams.

Book your free AI audit